Trust is the new currency.

For decades, brands chased polish. Cleaner logos, smoother transitions, more seamless user experiences. The logic was simple, professionalism signals quality, and quality earns trust.

That logic just broke.

AI flooded the market with perfection. It can generate flawless copy, pixel-perfect designs, and video that looks like it cost a hundred thousand dollars to produce. And in doing so, it devalued the very thing brands spent decades pursuing. When anyone can produce polish in seconds, polish stops meaning anything.

We're watching an economic correction unfold in real time. Attention used to be the scarce resource brands competed for. Now attention is cheap — algorithms serve endless content to endless eyeballs. What's actually scarce is trust. And trust, it turns out, requires proof of human intent.

This is where imperfection enters as a brand strategy.

Users are developing what might be called "synthetic fatigue." They've seen enough AI-generated content to recognize the tells — the slightly-too-clean aesthetic, the generic competence, the feeling that something was assembled rather than created.

This fatigue isn't rational. It's not that AI content is bad. Often it's technically superior. But something about knowing a machine produced it triggers a trust discount. The content might be beautiful, but it doesn't feel meant. There's no one on the other side who cared whether you received it.

Brands are responding by leaving fingerprints. Raw videos where the founder stumbles over words. Behind-the-scenes photos that haven't been color-graded. Employee stories that ramble a bit before landing. Each imperfection says that a human made this, and they chose to show you the seams.

Even Apple, a company that could generate flawless CGI in its sleep made this bet. When they rebranded Apple TV in late 2025, they built a real glass apple sculpture, lit it by hand, and captured every shimmer in-camera. For heavens sake, craftspeople rotating glass under precision lights until they got the shot. As soon as people learned it was done for real, they celebrated. The deliberate rejection of digital perfection became the story.

Seamless experiences are forgettable. When everything glides past without resistance, nothing sticks in memory. The brain doesn't flag it as meaningful. But introduce a moment of texture, a pause, an oddity, something that doesn't quite fit the template, attention catches. The user registers that something different is happening.

The path to connection runs through deliberate imperfection. The design world is calling this "post-minimalism." Minimalist structure, but layered with personality that algorithms wouldn't naturally generate. Hand-drawn elements over clean layouts. Bold typography that breaks the grid. Non-linear storytelling that rewards patience rather than optimizing for the scroll.

When a website is too smooth, users glide past without forming memory. When a brand's voice is too polished, it sounds like everyone else's. Imperfection is what makes you pause and that ONE FREAKIN PAUSE is the first step toward trusting.

Smart brands are getting explicit about this. They're disclosing their "human-to-AI ratio", which parts of their content were generated, which were human-crafted, which were some blend of both.

This transparency sounds risky, but it's actually a trust accelerant. In a world where users assume everything might be synthetic, declaring your human investment becomes a differentiator. You're not hiding the machine; you're showing where the person is.

The most effective approach treats AI as underpainting. Let the machine handle the mechanical work, resizing, formatting, data analysis, first-draft structure. Free up human time for the parts AI still can't replicate, the joke that lands, the empathy that connects, the cultural reference that signals you're actually paying attention.

This is not anti-AI, it's pro-intent. The goal is demonstrating that a human decided this content should exist, shaped it to matter, and released it because they believed it would serve you.

Just like this piece.

We're early in this shift, and the dynamics will keep evolving. As AI-generated content improves, the signals of human creation will need to become more sophisticated. What reads as "authentic" today will calcify into new clichés tomorrow. The grainy founder video, repeated enough times, becomes its own form of polish.

But the underlying economics won't change. Trust remains scarce. Human intent remains valuable. And imperfection remains the proof.

Winners won't be the brands with the best production values. They'll be the ones where you can feel a person behind the pixels — someone who cared whether you got what you came for.

Perfection used to be the goal, but now it's a liability.

Imperfection is the new brand strategy because they're inherently human. And in an economy where trust is the currency, humanity is what you're actually selling.

— Shashank

P.S.

If you found this edition valuable, I'd appreciate you forwarding this email to one person who might need this perspective right now.

And if you are the one who received it, you can subscribe here.